For my own part, I abandon the ethics of duty to the Hegelian critique with no regrets; it would appear to me, indeed, to have been correctly characterized by Hegel as an abstract thought, as a thought of understanding.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
It was also Hegel who established the view that the different philosophic systems that we find in history are to be comprehended in terms of development and that they are generally one-sided because they owe their origins to a reaction against what has gone before.
Well, I don't know if I can comment on Kant or Hegel because I'm no real philosopher in the sense of knowing what these people have said in any detail so let me not comment on that too much.
I am still moved by passages of Marx: the 'Critique of Hegel's Philosophy of Right,' for example, where, after the famous line about religion being 'the opium of the people,' he goes on to call it 'the heart of a heartless world.'
At the present moment, the security of coherent philosophy, which existed from Parmenides to Hegel, is lost.
A great interpreter of life ought not himself to need interpretation.
If I had a worldview, and I don't know if I do, but if I did, it's one that's intensely humanistic.
Take from the philosopher the pleasure of being heard and his desire for knowledge ceases.
The ethical manifold, conceived of as unified, furnishes, or rather is, the ideal of the whole.
Hegel was right when he said that we learn from history that man can never learn anything from history.
My personal philosophy of life is one of ethics.