It is always possible to argue against an interpretation, to confront interpretations, to arbitrate between them and to seek for an agreement, even if this agreement remains beyond our reach.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Unless both sides win, no agreement can be permanent.
I have disagreements with some and more agreements with others. But that doesn't mean I cannot listen to those I disagree with.
If it is true that there is always more than one way of construing a text, it is not true that all interpretations are equal.
We can be fervent in our disagreements without being factitious with our beliefs.
All things are subject to interpretation whichever interpretation prevails at a given time is a function of power and not truth.
Disagreements will always occur between us, but we all approach them wanting the best for each and every one of us, for the whole people.
When we argue for our limitations, we get to keep them.
It is possible to interpret without observing, but not to observe without interpreting.
Negotiating in the classic diplomatic sense assumes parties more anxious to agree than to disagree.
The human race is facing all kinds of problems, and all we are doing is pointing fingers and saying, 'Your interpretation of the problem is different from my interpretations of the problem.'