More often there's a compromise between ethics and expediency.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
I think ethics is always there; it's not always a very thoughtful or reflective ethics.
The ability to compromise is not a diplomatic politeness toward a partner but rather taking into account and respecting your partner's legitimate interests.
In day-to-day life, you have stimulus to behave unethically, but in the long term, it always pays off to be ethical.
Ethics to me is very important.
I don't think there's anything in the compromise that means that there's a clash of ethics.
I would like us to think about it more explicitly, and not take our intuitions as the given of ethics, but rather to reflect on it, and be more open about the fact that something is an ethical issues and think what we ought to do about it.
Expedience, not justice, is the rule of contemporary American law.
In just about every area of society, there's nothing more important than ethics.
There's a great deal of difference between thinking reflectively about moral issues and achieving higher standards of ethical behavior.
Ethics is nothing else than reverence for life.