Today there is a division between those who write about literature and those who create it. I, obviously, don't think that should be there.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
I am more and more convinced that literature is made up of works, genres, schools, discussions, problems, collective work in order to solve certain problems.
I think the job of writing and literature is to encourage each one of us to believe that we're living in a story.
Calling one thing 'literature' and another 'fiction' is a way to create status where there is none.
I consider what I write to be literature. I choose the words carefully.
If people aren't creating literature, there would be nothing for people to criticize.
Literature is a far more ancient and viable thing than any social formation or state. And just as the state interferes in literature, literature has the right to interfere in the affairs of state.
There is a tradition that sees journalism as the dark side of literature, with book writing at its zenith. I don't agree. I think that all written work constitutes literature, even graffiti.
I attempt to write a good novel. Whether it is literature or not is something that will be decided by the ages, not by me and not by a pack of critics around the globe.
The writer studies literature, not the world.
The function of literature, through all its mutations, has been to make us aware of the particularity of selves, and the high authority of the self in its quarrel with its society and its culture. Literature is in that sense subversive.
No opposing quotes found.