I don't know if I would do sequels. I almost feel like when I'm done with them, they're going to have to find their own way.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
I didn't really want to do another sequel. I go to those movies, and I just sort of enjoy them like a viewer.
I'm not big on sequels; I've done them, but I like doing little things that have their own timelessness to them, classic type things, and then you go onto something new.
The only reason I would write a sequel is if I were struck by an idea that I felt to be equal to the original. Too many sequels diminish the original.
I think a sequel is a waste of money and time. I think movies should illuminate new stories.
I think sequels are fine if there's a story, so I think when there is a property that is worthy of a sequel, it could very well happen!
I pointedly avoid doing sequels, since for the most part I find that a sequel rarely stands up to the original.
You do sequels because they are tent poles. They open well, and they hold the tent up. But in between, you make a movie you respect.
I never actually plan sequels. They demand to be done.
My gut feeling about sequels is that they should be premeditated: You should try to write a trilogy first or at least sketch out a trilogy if you have any faith in your film.
I hate the idea of sequels. I think you should be able to do it in one book.