With Shakespeare, there's no subtext; you're speaking exactly what you're thinking constantly.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
Shakespeare doesn't really write subtext, you play the subtext.
We have cut the text, but what remains are Shakespeare's words.
Shakespeare is the one who gets re-interpreted most frequently.
This is not writing at all. Indeed, I could say that Shakespeare surpasses literature altogether, if I knew what I meant.
I've never really had a desire to do Shakespeare. For me, it's just too many lines.
I think what matters most in literary work is the context, not the text.
Even Shakespeare gives you a scene off.
With Shakespeare, because you invest so much time in working on material, it always sort of stays with you to some degree.
Well, as a kid I did not get Shakespeare. I just never understood it.
You never get the Shakespeares right. It's not possible.
No opposing quotes found.