Unfortunately, the author of a book pretty much gives up control of the story when the producers take over a book to make it into a movie.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
I know a movie and a book are two different things and you are going do different media in different ways. No author can want a movie to be exactly like the book because then it will be a bad movie.
Some writers get snooty about what happens when their books are adapted to film, but I don't feel that way.
I'm always frustrated when somebody makes a movie out of a book and they leave the book behind, or the heart of it.
Obviously there's a lot more to a TV show than just a book... I think adaptations are a bit tricky for the screenwriters because they're worried about upsetting the author.
Often in the past, there have been authors that were deeply disappointed in their adaptation, but that's because they haven't accepted the fact that a movie is a different thing, and it can't possibly be the same as the book.
Authors of books are not given very much control over the films that are made from their books.
As long as a film stays unmade, the book is entirely yours, it belongs to the writer. As soon as you make it into a film, suddenly more people see it than have ever read the book.
I'm very troubled when editors oblige their film critics to read the novel before they see the film. Reading the book right before you see the film will almost certainly ruin the film for you.
As an author, it's a strange process to watch your novel turned into a movie. It's tremendously exciting but somewhat voyeuristic; after all, novelists are rarely involved in the process.
Writers are so used to books being optioned and then the movie never happens.