Nowadays, everyone seems to have a blog that finds readers.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
I have a severe Google Reader habit. I think people will use blog forms and Twitter to contrive fiction.
I had a blog for many years. Once you develop your readership on your blog, and you can put something out there or direct traffic or get attention - it's like a super power.
I think a lot of journal articles should really be blogs.
I'm not sure blogs are necessarily the best place to get a pulse on anything. People want to blog for a variety of reasons, and that may or may not be representative.
I started my blog in 2002. That was pre-MySpace, pre-Facebook. That was back before newspapers realized they were going out of business. That was back when no one gave any credence to Internet writers.
Well, there are more writers of blogs right now than there are readers, so that's clearly a vanity phenomenon.
There is something so hopeful about a diary, a journal, a new notebook, which Joan Didion and Virginia Woolf both wrote about. A blog. Perhaps we all are waiting for someone to discover us.
You know, some of the good part of blog theory was that blogs would be like diaries that the world could read. They would be spontaneous, whatever pops into your mind, as a diary would be.
I loathe blogs when I look at them. Blogs look, to me, illiterate. They look hasty, like someone babbling.
Blogs are for anoraks who couldn't get published any other way.