I've found that small wins, small projects, small differences often make huge differences.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
Companies generally work better when they are smaller. It's always worth spending time to think about the least amount of projects/work you can feasibly do, and then having as small a team as possible to do it.
On certain projects, on big public projects, people definitely are interested in making them greener, but on smaller projects with tight budgets it can be harder.
In a small company, you often see a lot more of what goes on in a broader range of things. And that's good.
Small businesses are more nimble and innovative than large corporations, and as a result are much more likely to develop the breakthrough ideas we need for global competitiveness.
For me, the winning strategy in any start-up business is, 'Think big but start small.'
Sometimes big problems are best solved with lots of small and creative solutions.
Juggling many projects and having all these accidental collisions that you can't predict enables a kind of comparative thinking. To focus on a single project from beginning to end is extremely difficult, not just for me, but for many people.
Whether I am collaborating with different people, I like changing projects conceptually so I can grow.
Whenever I start a project, I have a broad range of possibilities.
When you are developing something, you have to look at it individually. You can't compare and contrast it to the projects around it, because that way madness lies.