I think the notion that we have all the democracy that money can buy strays so far from what our democracy is supposed to be.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
If there was one decision I would overrule, it would be 'Citizens United.' I think the notion that we have all the democracy that money can buy strays so far from what our democracy is supposed to be.
The flood of money that gushes into politics today is a pollution of democracy.
I think that's most unfortunate about our Democratic system, that you're confining it to people who are either very wealthy in their own right or have capacity to gain access to large amounts of money.
Our only real hope for democracy is that we get the money out of politics entirely and establish a system of publicly funded elections.
In our political system, money is power. And that means a few can have a lot more power than the rest. That's bad news for everyone else - and for our democracy itself.
You know, this idea of going around the world imposing democracy by growing a middle-class, a trading merchant class that is independent of your faith, is a good notion, but we're all partially different - it's no good imposing systems on people that it doesn't suit.
Remember one thing about democracy. We can have anything we want and at the same time, we always end up with exactly what we deserve.
The unending chase for money, I believe, threatens to steal our democracy itself. I've used the word 'corrupting,' and I want to be very clear about it: I mean by it not the corruption of individuals, but a corruption of a system itself that all of us are forced to participate in against our will.
So I think one can say on empirical grounds - not because of some philosophical principle - that you can't have democracy unless you have a market economy.
I believe that it is an unchanging value of democracy that ends cannot justify the means in politics.
No opposing quotes found.