Eight, as you know, is not a good number for a multi-member court.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
The fact is, we are a nine-member court that sits on cases.
Anytime you get nine people together, whether it's at a party or it's in the conference room of the Supreme Court, you do have to maintain some order, or it does kind of degenerate into squabbling pretty quickly.
If, in a few months, I'm only number 8 or number 10 in the world, I'll have to look at what off-the-court work I can do. I will need to do something if I want to be number 1.
And it's a lot harder to hide with four musicians than it is with eight.
It is not good to have a rule of many.
I think there needs to be a range of justices, of all types. You can't just pick one type.
When you go into court you are putting your fate into the hands of twelve people who weren't smart enough to get out of jury duty.
I think when you've played at the level that I've played, anything outside the top 10 in certain aspects is just a number, unless you're obviously trying to get into tournaments and stuff.
Possession isn't nine-tenths of the law. It's nine-tenths of the problem.
I appreciate Eight is Enough. It made me recognizable.