Apart from being interested in a good role, I think it's necessary to make up your mind as to whether it will make a movie that will entertain an audience all over the world and not just in your own backyard.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
The way the films look will never entertain an audience alone. It has to be in the service of a good story with great characters.
I want to make films that cater to the world audiences.
Movies are becoming more global, which is making them less intimate. If you make a movie for the world, you don't make it for any country.
We make films that we ourselves would want to see and then hope that other people would want to see it. If you try to analyze audiences or think there's some sophisticated recipe for success, then I think you are doomed. You're making it too complicated.
It's great to be in a film that's able to have people really want to become socially conscious, to walk out of the theatre and want to do something.
Whether you think a film will affect society or it's plain entertainment, it's all excellent, it's all noble.
I will always choose to work in a movie based on whether I would want to watch it - if I would be willing to spend money in a theatre on it. The script and the people you will work with come after that.
I think that a good movie creates its own world, and that world needn't refer to anything that's real. If it's consistent, if it's entertaining, if it's interesting, it justifies its being there.
I do a film if it interests me, has a connect with the audience and some entertainment value. The rest doesn't matter.
Whether it's a movie I'm in or not, if there's a good movie, and it's low budget, and you know everyone's done it just because they were passionate about it and they cared for it, if it has any kind of audience, it's just a wonderful outcome.