Clean water is a great example of something that depends on energy. And if you solve the water problem, you solve the food problem.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
Some solutions are relatively simple and would provide economic benefits: implementing measures to conserve energy, putting a price on carbon through taxes and cap-and-trade and shifting from fossil fuels to clean and renewable energy sources.
Food is not just eating energy. It's an experience.
The scientific community should work as hard as possible to address major issues that affect our everyday lives such as climate change, infectious diseases and counterterrorism; in particular, 'clean energy' research deserves far higher priority. And science and technology are the prime routes to tackling these issues.
The energy you create around you is perhaps going to be the most important attribute - in the long run, EQ trumps IQ. Without being a source of energy for others, very little can be accomplished.
Organisms sip energy, because they have to work or barter for every single bit that they get.
I don't believe in expending energy on something you can't do anything about. If there was some easy way of fixing things, I'd probably do it.
The trouble with energy farming is that the energy isn't always where you want to use it, and it isn't always when you want to use it.
Energy begets energy.
Beyond reducing individual use, one of our top priorities must be to move from fossil fuels to energy that has fewer detrimental effects on water supplies and fewer environmental impacts overall.
One of the fastest ways to build the clean energy economy is to allow more people to benefit from it.
No opposing quotes found.