So many people are not aware that NPR writes things, 'posts' things. But we are spreading the word.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
What NPR did, I'm very proud of, and what NPR stood for is non-racist, non-bigoted, straightforward telling of the news.
And I tend to listen to NPR when I'm not writing.
I think the Huffington Post has been inventive and presents what it aggregates well.
To use a word I never thought I'd apply to myself, I've sort of become a Luddite with regard to information. Where everyone else is getting their Twitter feeds from 'The New York Times' and their 'Huffington Post' emails, I live in a little bit of a bubble.
We're journalists, so our default position is we're not writing editorial. We're trying to bring information to readers, viewers, so that they can make up their own conclusions.
Newspaper reporting is really storytelling. We call our articles 'stories,' and we try to tell them in a way that even people who don't know all the background can understand them.
With the evolution of social media that includes blogging, Facebook, and Twitter, who and how information is delivered has changed tremendously. The landscape for news is a different place, and people have to accept that.
We journalists make it a point to know very little about an extremely wide variety of topics; this is how we stay objective.
I think of us as journalists; the medium we work in is blogging.
Being a journalist, you write what you see. If we can't do that, what use are we? I turned years of training on myself.
No opposing quotes found.