We know what's in our Cheerios and in our retirement accounts because the law requires disclosure.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
As with products on supermarket shelves, the public has a right to know where their financial products and services come from.
I believe people have a right to know what's going on with their information and how it's collected, how it's stored and who gets it.
Selling drug secrets violates a trust that is fundamental to the integrity of both scientific research and our financial markets.
The time has come for all evangelists to practice full financial disclosure. The world is watching how we walk and how we talk. We must have the highest standards of morality, ethics and integrity if we are to continue to have influence.
We have a way of dealing with information that has sort of personal - personally identifying information in it. But there are legitimate secrets - you know, your records with your doctor; that's a legitimate secret. But we deal with whistleblowers that are coming forward that are really sort of well motivated.
It is up to the government to keep the government's secrets.
If the government did a good job of publicizing this information, my products wouldn't sell.
If we're going to talk about our businesses, we're going to have to talk about them within the constraints of the disclosure rules, without giving guidance, because we're not going to give guidance, because we don't believe that it is a sensible game to play.
The people who know personal finance hide the money very carefully.
We have lost the idea that something can be secret because it is valuable, not because it's shameful. If you share everything with everybody, what have you got for yourself? I tweet and I blog, but I save a lot for myself. Not because I am ashamed.
No opposing quotes found.