Quote

My background is basically scientific math. My Dad was a physicist, so I have it in my blood somewhere. Scientific method is very important to me. I think anything that contradicts it is probably not true.

I study myself more than any other subject; it is my metaphysic, and my physic.

And so, you can do hundreds and hundreds of studies showing a general factor and just so long as you restrict your populations, your testing materials and the kinds of situations you look at, you can keep finding the same wrong thing again and again.

I'm really focused on my research almost 100 percent. That, and my family and kids.

I study myself more than any other subject. That is my metaphysics, that is my physics.

If you are a researcher, you are trying to figure out what the question is as well as what the answer is.

I struggled with each of these studies and I was uncertain about what they meant, and often confused, and then I tried to put together what I was seeing.

Analysis I take to be a scientific procedure. What I do is creative. It doesn't spring from the same part of the mind.

Studies perfect nature and are perfected still by experience.

I'm not much of an analyzer or a psychologist.