Cities like New York have already followed San Francisco and have started similar organizations like sfCiti; New York has TECH NYC.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Companies that get started and built in New York City tend to be applied technology.
I started sfCiti because I believed that technology companies needed to take a 'One City' approach and build a shared sense of community and civic responsibility in San Francisco.
You see 6,000 times more tech companies in San Francisco than you see in Seattle. All the money is in San Francisco when you look at the venture fund maps. The PR is in San Francisco. The centricity of the industry is in San Francisco.
Think of everything in Seattle - Microsoft, Amazon, Starbucks. Then you go down to Silicon Valley - Intel, Apple, Google, Facebook, Twitter. What does New York produce?
I would still rather be in Silicon Alley. I like the West Coast also, but it's sort of fragmented. You have companies in downtown San Francisco, companies in Mountain View, and people are driving between them all. It's kind of nice in New York to just jump in a cab and reach another company so easily.
I am committed to ensuring San Francisco remains a center for tech and the innovation capital of the world.
I wish the city of San Francisco, bastion of liberalism, were more innovative when it comes to how to spread the wealth.
Silicon Valley has been a technology capital like New York is a financial capital.
New York has always been a city of change and a city about change, and it is a back-leading development. Nobody's going to want to come to New York if it looks like another strip mall.
New York is such a versatile city, and there's always something new to discover.
No opposing quotes found.