I think it's possible to make a blockbuster that is actually emotional. They don't need to be mutually exclusive.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
If you have a movie that doesn't strive to go to a certain emotional point, you can do anything and it will be fine and funny. But if you have something pretty emotional at its core, you have to make it right. You don't want it overwrought or unearned. Everything has to be moving towards this one thing.
Yes, but Hollywood is the strangest place in that they'll torpedo their own film to prove an emotional point.
In movies, people seem to be more emotional than they would ever be if that situation was actually happening to them.
The movie business is very much like that: people in authority making purely emotional decisions instead of interesting rational ones.
I think a movie is a media that is evoking feelings.
Having to make a blockbuster every time puts unhealthy pressure on creatives. The pressure on the filmmakers is so intense, I think it stifles the creativity.
I find films incredibly emotional. That's the power of the medium.
Movies can provide tear-inducing or comically-entertaining representations of love, but many agree that its deeper conflicting complexities often seem unfathomable.
It is important that alongside the blockbusters there are stories that can inspire and audiences can experience together in the cinema.
I firmly believe that emotions are universal, and I know that when they connect with the audience, it works. There is no such thing as an entertaining or a serious film; there are good films and bad films. Good films will always find a vast audience.