This is a bipartisan effort. This is just good common sense. This is where the public wants us to go. They want us to not be so dependent on foreign oil.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
We shouldn't be so dependent on foreign oil.
One of our priorities should be to reduce our dependence on foreign oil.
But they are not going to take on Big Oil because Big Oil is very generous at campaign time, and this is all about the elections. They want to pretend that they are doing something meaningful.
We need a balanced, long term energy policy to reduce our dependence on foreign oil and preserve the beauty of the land we love.
It is important that the United States move with all deliberate speed to develop and get into usage alternative fuels that will allow us to end our dependence on foreign oil.
Bipartisanship is nice, but it cannot be a substitute for action, not having it cannot prevent us from going forward.
It is clear our nation is reliant upon big foreign oil. More and more of our imports come from overseas.
With gas prices nationally, and especially in our area, increasingly on the rise, it is more crucial then ever that we take steps to diversify our energy sources and reduce our dependency on foreign oil.
We need to break our dependency on foreign sources of oil, which leaves us at the mercy of foreign powers. To do that, we should increase domestic energy production.
I don't think it should be a surprise when we're talking about energy and trying to have more home-grown energy, be less reliant on foreign oil when you look at our health care that we're trying to get more affordable health care, that these are going to create major debates in this country and be somewhat polarizing.
No opposing quotes found.