There are very few personal problems that cannot be solved through a suitable application of high explosives.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Although personally I am quite content with existing explosives, I feel we must not stand in the path of improvement.
You can have the best technology, but you if have a corrupted, radicalized, bribed official that has access to the plane to put the bomb in the cargo, as what happened in Sharm el-Sheikh, that's a real problem.
The Oklahoma City bombing was simple technology, horribly used. The problem is not technology. The problem is the person or persons using it.
You can have the best technology, but if you have an inside job of a worker that has access to the plane that's corrupted or bribed or radicalized, they can get a bomb on that aircraft and blow it up.
There are some problems that technology can't solve.
You can absolutely drive through an atmospheric bomb test and not be affected.
You can't bomb a people just in case.
Increased and better screening for explosives is necessary - and Congress should fund it and TSA should implement it as quickly as possible - however that screening doesn't reduce the risk posed by a trained terrorist with an unconventional weapon.
The greatest danger of bombs is in the explosion of stupidity that they provoke.
The Internet doesn't like you to learn too much about explosives.