The more important the subject and the closer it cuts to the bone of our hopes and needs, the more we are likely to err in establishing a framework for analysis.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
You've heard the saying, 'Analysis creates paralysis.' You can't be 100 percent sure of anything.
Seriously, these days I tend to shut up in terms of external analysis and DO try to let things speak for themselves, while still trying to get some depth into them.
The main concern of the study is with the outline of a theoretical system. Its minor variations from writer to writer are not a matter of concern to this analysis.
Too often new ideas are studied and analyzed until they are suffocated.
Analysis I take to be a scientific procedure. What I do is creative. It doesn't spring from the same part of the mind.
I've never gone into analysis. But Freud opened a door, I know.
Sometimes one can be so closely involved with things that the larger context is lost to view.
We assert that the subject is crucial and only that subject matter is valid which is tragic and timeless.
In science, one should use all available resources to solve difficult problems. One of our most powerful resources is the insight of our colleagues.
Thus there arose in me both a need and a plan for the foundation of the human sciences.
No opposing quotes found.