Now it really is, believe it or not, 90% of the films are green lit, not by the studio heads, but by the marketing department.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
For movies to get greenlit solely based on the success of other movies that have a lot of women in them? It's so ridiculous to me.
I've realized that what you think of when you make a 'big movie,' if it's actually a green screen movie, it's like doing independent New York theater because you don't have any backgrounds or props. So it's kind of like making the lowest budgeted film you could possibly imagine, plus $100 million.
When you have these surprise breakout films that do well, that have good performances in them, it puts a lot of pressure on the Academy to recognize those projects, so it's more of a conversation about what is greenlit.
The long and short of it is that I am now in a position in England to green light movies, and that's really excellent - not high-budget movies, but movies none the less.
When you're doing a film that has so many effects, you do a lot of it on green screen, and you can't see what that world is.
Nowadays, to get a movie greenlit, you have to make an incredible effort.
Simultaneously, the movie business now experiments with a colorblind approach to casting.
The movies 'Dope' and 'Straight Outta Compton' blew me away. I love seeing directors and writers of color make amazing slices of pop culture.
The film business has changed hugely. You seem to spend about 30 per cent of the time producing the films and 70 per cent talking about it.
We need more filmmakers of color telling the story. I'd like to see more filmmakers take their products out independently, put together a good commercial film and distribute it online.
No opposing quotes found.