Animal vision - including human vision - is so biased toward movement that we don't technically see stationary objects at all.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Seeing is in itself a movement.
In real life, that's how we're moving around. We look at things while we're walking and moving and turning around. We stare at objects in the world.
No lens is quick enough to track the movement of the human body. The molecules are always moving.
Robotics are beginning to cross that line from absolutely primitive motion to motion that resembles animal or human behavior.
I've often noticed that we are not able to look at what we have in front of us, unless it's inside a frame.
I think living things can recognize the movement of other living things, and all the best animators in the world can't quite capture that something.
Dogs are the only mammals that will actually stare and look into a human's eyes.
Sometimes, when we're very, very still, we're more aware of movement than when we make a lot of movement outwardly.
The impression left after watching the motions of birds is that of extreme mobility - a life of perpetual impulse checked only by fear.
We cannot afford to exclude any vision - any way of looking at the world - that human beings have invented for ourselves.