Start-up teams are always in flux, so, like all start-ups, we're always talking to candidates for various key roles.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Naming a transition team varies with the intentions of the candidate; some candidates have been careful to name a transition team as much as a year in advance.
In the early days, start-ups make the main mistake of hiring people to do the work that they could do themselves.
I've worked with a lot of first-time directors who kind of look to me for ideas and opinions and stuff, and I'm a team player.
When you step on the field, you want to be a starter. You want to be the person everybody looks to and says, 'If we need a play to be made, let's go to him.'
I'm always trying to look for different roles.
The start-ups that do well are the ones that are working all the time.
Start-ups should be hunch-driven early on and data-driven as they scale.
We try to recruit good players and good people.
If people make a lot of introductions, should they get recognized for it? I've never seen a score showing who's a good connector. That'd be useful, right?
In order to protect against being disrupted, startups also need to recruit employees that are committed to life-long learning. The skills that made your team members valuable may not be the skills needed to take your company to the next level or to compete in emerging markets.
No opposing quotes found.