You can't have thousands of cars without good computers on the electric grid.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Electric cars aren't pollution-free; they have to get their energy from somewhere.
Because of its shortcomings - driving range, cost, and recharging time - the electric vehicle is not a viable replacement for most conventional cars.
We need to invest dramatically in green energy, making solar panels so cheap that everybody wants them. Nobody wanted to buy a computer in 1950, but once they got cheap, everyone bought them.
Electric cars are coal-powered cars. Their carbon emissions can be worse than gasoline-powered cars.
At Tesla, we don't go into a community and think we're going to sell one or two cars.
We've been working now with computers and education for 30 years, computers in developing countries for 20 years, and trying to make low-cost machines for 10 years. This is not a sudden turn down the road.
And autos are not the only product that could be made more energy efficient if we just put in place sensible requirements. This is also true of many appliances and even of entire buildings.
We have never lived in a time with the opportunity to put a computer in the pocket of 5 billion people.
Productivity is grounded in the PC. Where does the computing power come from? How would you run 'USA Today' without PCs? Run a hospital without PCs? People don't want products, they want solutions.
People are so bad at driving cars that computers don't have to be that good to be much better. Any time you stand in line at the D.M.V. and look around, you're like, Oh, my God, I wish all these people were replaced by computer drivers.
No opposing quotes found.