If there were any clear investigation of 9/11, they wouldn't let Louie Freeh off the hook.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Louis Freeh said on national TV that actionable intelligence could have allowed us to stop the hijackings.
Fahrenheit 9/11 took public domain information that should have been on the news every night and put it in a film that a lot of people went to see. But still Bush has never had to answer those charges.
And Louis Freeh was a completely dysfunctional FBI Director, who was actually waging his own private war against the Clinton Administration.
You want to toe the line with tough investigations without falling into political grandstanding inherent in Washington on both sides of the aisle.
The expectations are that when this investigation is completed, Fitzgerald will make the appropriate decision, which is not to charge Karl with any criminal offenses.
The president really shouldn't be involved in terms of dictating what course the investigation should take.
But there is scant evidence to tie Saddam to terrorist organizations, and even less to the Sept. 11 attacks.
We have not learned the lessons of 9/11. This wrongful suspicion, racial hatred, and profiling is what I keep seeing.
Most people inside the bureau believe that the blown opportunities to head off 9/11 would not recur today. Even among the FBI's doubters, few disagree that the bureau has come a long way.
I'd read so much right-wing crime fiction where they find the evidence and shoot the bad guy - I thought there must be another approach.
No opposing quotes found.