I had the greatest time of my life making 'Saw 3.' More fun than '2' for sure.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
The 'Saw' sequels went in a direction I wouldn't have gone in. With 'Insidious 2,' I wanted to push a potential franchise in the direction I thought it should go in.
I didn't direct any of the 'Saw' sequels, but people thought I did.
'Saw' was good and bad. It was good in that it gave me a career start, but it was also negative in that it really marginalized me as a filmmaker.
The flack I got for 'Saw' is why I wanted to direct 'Insidious 2.'
I think that the first 'Saw' was really more of a psychological film about two people stuck in a room, and the traps and games that fans seem to embrace so much now were quite a small portion of the film.
I've always made sequels, even when I was making Super 8 movies if the audience liked it.
I've always liked 3D.
'Saw' really was like a student film for me; we expected it to go straight to video. I never expected anyone to see that film, and then it becomes one of the most successful horror franchises.
I'm not a blood and guts person. I remember seeing 'House of Wax' as a teenager in 3D. This was years ago, the original 'House of Wax', and that was scary enough for me that I thought I'd never see another one.
I suppose the most fun I had was on the second film.