The 'Saw' sequels went in a direction I wouldn't have gone in. With 'Insidious 2,' I wanted to push a potential franchise in the direction I thought it should go in.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
With 'Insidious 2,' I wanted to push a potential franchise in the direction I thought it should go in.
The flack I got for 'Saw' is why I wanted to direct 'Insidious 2.'
'Insidious 2' is a direct continuation of the first movie. We literally pick up from where we left off at the end of the first film. And whereas the first movie is a twist on the haunted house genre, the second movie is a twist on the classic domestic thriller.
I didn't direct any of the 'Saw' sequels, but people thought I did.
I don't know if I would do sequels. I almost feel like when I'm done with them, they're going to have to find their own way.
I didn't really want to do another sequel. I go to those movies, and I just sort of enjoy them like a viewer.
I had the greatest time of my life making 'Saw 3.' More fun than '2' for sure.
I think a sequel is a waste of money and time. I think movies should illuminate new stories.
If you think about it, a lot of great horror films have bad sequels just because the market demands you to make the other one right away. Thank God no one in the 'Evil Dead' family thinks that way.
I never actually plan sequels. They demand to be done.
No opposing quotes found.