I never felt ostracized or made to feel strange by obsessing over 'The Onion' or 'Calvin and Hobbes.' That was considered completely normal.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
It's hard to think of another body of work that is more universally beloved - I don't think I've ever met someone who has encountered 'Calvin and Hobbes' without falling for them.
Calvin and Hobbes are the only two characters from my childhood reading that I return to with any regularity, and they have grown with me, yielding newer and deeper meaning.
When I was 13, I had these episodes where I could just see the world without any words attached to it, without any associations. It was a little bit spooky. A lot of people might have even thought it was pathological. I thought it was interesting.
As a child, I was consumed with a near-obsessive curiosity about what the world felt like for other creatures.
We thought everybody read comics. We didn't know we were weird. We didn't know people that collected comics were strange. It was as normal as listening to rock music on the radio.
I've always had bizarre, negative feelings about anything traditional, like marriage and family. I never thought something like that worked.
I'm still astounded by some people's reaction to things I consider quite normal.
It is true that I am often startled and even angered and repulsed by the strange directions and provocative content of new forms that seem to pop up every few months.
I was working on 'Harry Potter' while I was growing up, and the attention it brought me made me feel quite isolated.
I hate Calvin and Hobbes. I think its a big re-hash of formula kid strips.