I think it's inevitable that aviation is a part of the economic growth that surrounds airports.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
The need for air transport is real, and it's not going to change. The key is to have the right business model and have the right initiatives, in my view, to succeed.
New highways, ports, and runways appear economically foolish if we don't understand the economic growth that flows from such investments.
But I don't think the popularity of flying has diminished a bit.
A lot of airlines have come and gone.
I think airlines have been very much parrots. They'll just follow what everyone else is doing. Why change a model that they're happy in? And it takes someone like myself or Richard Branson who comes from outside the industry to say, 'Hey, let's try something new.'
With the increased cost of gasoline, it doesn't appear that we're going to see a slowing of interest in mass transit. I think it's going to continue to grow.
The whole infrastructure of air travel was, and is, part of government policy. It is not a natural development of a free economic system - at least not in the way that is claimed. The same is true of the roads, of course.
With us air people, the future of our nation is indissolubly bound up in the development of air power.
Airports in major cities, like LAX, are trippy environments. It is at once a national and international gathering of those in transition: The euphoric, emerging from planes, their journey at an end, and the determined, about to depart.
Aviation is for the common man. My goal is to enable everyone to fly. It shouldn't be only for the rich.