The system becomes logically closed when each of the logical implications which can be derived from any one proposition within the system finds its statement in another proposition in the same system.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
That is, a system starts with a group of interrelated propositions which involve reference to empirical observations within the logical framework of the propositions in question.
I don't like closed systems.
For something to collapse, not all systems have to shut down. In most cases, just one system is enough. For example, the human body is a system of systems. If just one system, such as the cardiovascular system, shuts down, death follows.
The system becomes more coherent as it is further extended. The elements which we require for explaining a new class of facts are already contained in our system. In false theories, the contrary is the case.
To every object there correspond an ideally closed system of truths that are true of it and, on the other hand, an ideal system of possible cognitive processes by virtue of which the object and the truths about it would be given to any cognitive subject.
A theoretical system does not merely state facts which have been observed and that logically deducible relations to other facts which have also been observed.
A closed mind is a dying mind.
When people make judgments they close all the possibility around them.
Logic is in the eye of the logician.
Closed systems run down and get more chaotic over time. Always get better by being 'open' to outside energy and templates of better ways to function.