In both law and politics, I think the essential battle is the meta-battle of framing the narrative.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Considerations of plot do a great deal of heavy lifting when it comes to long-form narrative - readers will overlook the most ham-fisted prose if only a writer can make them long to know what happens next.
Narrative is so rich; it's given up so much.
People read legal writing differently. When you're at the crux of a legal argument, every step is a step in the argument. The judge will see any holes. If you do that in fiction, it's too long and boring.
I think that internal conflict works very well, because, after all, all the best drama is fuelled by conflict.
I think a lot of moral debates are not over what is the basis of justice, but who gets a ticket to play in the game.
I'm a storyteller. I feel like the issue of discourse is an important one because there's a lot of political and ideological discourse that goes around, and we relate to that on an intellectual level.
I'm real bent on dialogue. I'm just a little bit crazy and when you put that along with 20 years as a criminal lawyer, it's pretty easy to come up with some interesting plots.
At the heart of drama is conflict.
Drama usually has some sort of intense conflict.
We're lawyers. We present the arguments, and the court sorts out the merits.