To announce that there must be no criticism of the president... is morally treasonable to the American public.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
That we are to stand by the President right or wrong is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.
I would be concerned if any speech to Congress related any information that's new to the president of the United States.
It should be remembered that the president cannot, by executive order, do things that affects the public at large unless there is some Congressional basis for it.
I have always considered it as treason against the great republic of human nature, to make any man's virtues the means of deceiving him.
If I were to make public these tapes, containing blunt and candid remarks on many different subjects, the confidentiality of the office of the president would always be suspect.
The Obama administration leaks classified information continuously. They do it to glorify the President, or manipulate public opinion, or even to help produce a pre-election propaganda film about the Osama bin Laden raid.
Disunion by force is treason.
There is an institutional cynicism that causes reporters to question everything the President says, and the motives of everything the President and his Administration try to accomplish.
I'm not saying that President Obama should be exempt from criticism, nor do I believe it is some act of racial treason for a black person to hold our president accountable for his actions.
All respect for the office of the presidency aside, I assumed that the obvious and unadulterated decline of freedom and constitutional sovereignty, not to mention the efforts to curb the power of judicial review, spoke for itself.
No opposing quotes found.