A bullet can kill the enemy, but a bullet can also produce an enemy, depending on whom that bullet strikes.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
Under well-settled legal principles, lethal force against a valid military objective, in an armed conflict, is consistent with the law of war and does not, by definition, constitute an 'assassination.'
The best weapon against an enemy is another enemy.
In order to have an enemy, one must be somebody. One must be a force before he can be resisted by another force. A malicious enemy is better than a clumsy friend.
The enemy resembles us. Therefore, he needs to be approached not as an assembly of 'targets' to be destroyed one by one; but as a living, intelligent entity capable of acting and reacting.
Wars based on principle are far more destructive... the attacker will not destroy that which he is after.
When you carry a gun, you mean to harm somebody, kill somebody.
One must be a somebody before they can have a enemy. One must be a force before he can be resisted by another force.
Guns are evil! And very little good comes from the availability of a bullet designed to kill human beings!
The enemy is anybody who's going to get you killed, no matter which side he's on.
Guns do kill. Unlike cars, that is all they do.