I think science has begun to demonstrate that aging is a disease. If it is, it can be cured.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
The way that we are going after ageing, I think, is a problem. The modern medical model is basically designed to attack one disease at a time. Independent of all other diseases and independent of the basic process of ageing itself.
The hope is that if we can increase youthfulness, we can postpone age-related diseases.
'Aging' has been bad ever since we figured out it led to dying.
Aging is not currently regarded as a disease, but researchers tend increasingly to view it as the common origin of conditions like insulin resistance or cardiovascular disease, whose incidence rises with age. In treating cell aging, we could prevent these diseases.
No one can avoid aging, but aging productively is something else.
As soon as a handful of scientists come up with an intervention shown to influence aging in other species, they begin selling it as an intervention for humans, even though there may not be evidence it works.
There is an anti-aging possibility, but it has to come from within.
Age is the single largest risk factor for an enormous number of diseases. So if you can essentially postpone aging, then you can have beneficial effects on a whole wide range of disease.
The biggest myth about aging is that we can't do anything about it. That it's a road to being decrepit, frail, and sick.
The field of ageing research is full of characters. We have hucksters claiming that cures for ageing can be bought and sold; prophetic seers, their hands extended for money, warning that immortality is nigh; and would-be Nobelists working methodically in laboratories in search of a pill to slow ageing.
No opposing quotes found.