It's this simple law, which every writer knows, of taking two opposites and putting them in a room together. I love anything with Cartman and Butters at the same time, it's great.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
It's been a fascinating thing because we didn't really know how to write when we started South Park at all. It's been like, we've just sort of grown up a bit and it's amazing to just see how, if you take Butters and Cartman and put them in any scene, it works.
I guess if I'm a product, either you're chocolate, you're vanilla or you're butterscotch. You can't be all three.
I had these recipes that say do this, do that. Who MAKES these rules?
I often write two books simultaneously. Usually one of them starts out as a fun experiment designed to give me a daily break from the real book I'm writing. And then that becomes a real book too.
A number of people have read 'Two-Way Split' and made certain assumptions about what the author's like, and I'm highly disappointing to them. I don't drink, I don't eat meat; that's very disappointing for a hard-boiled writer.
The way this whole novel thing came together was, I sold them one bill of goods and then didn't communicate very well. I am like Captain Run-on Sentence.
I thought this convention phenomenon was very flattering, but that's about the extent of it.
If you have extraordinary bread and extraordinary butter, it's hard to beat bread and butter.
It's harder to write a story with just two people in a room than with 50 characters.
When I cook a meal, I like to serve things one by one and keep them separate. I get that from my father - he's such a purist. Some people even put their desserts on the main plate. It's just wrong.
No opposing quotes found.