'Rome' plays on universal human emotions that hopefully people can relate to. Historians are always going to be offended by it.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
There's one thing that I like about Rome that was stated by Napoleon: that from sublime to pathetic is only one step away. And in Rome there's a constant shifting between sublime and pathetic.
The success of 'Rome' was in making the history accessible and giving viewers everyman characters through which they can connect to historical figures. It stops the story from being too remote.
I always thought 'Rome' would change things for me, that people would finally understand what I do.
In 'Roma,' I wanted to get across the idea that underneath Rome today is ancient Rome. So close. I am always conscious of that, and it thrills me. Imagine being in a traffic jam at the Coliseum! Rome is the most wonderful movie set in the world... As was the case with many of my film ideas, it was inspired by a dream.
Ancient Rome was a violent place.
I just love Rome. It really does cast a spell on you.
Rome holds my psyche in balance. Whenever I'm there, it's like a holiday.
The thing I love about Rome is that is has so many layers. In it, you can follow anything that interests you: town planning, architecture, churches or culture. It's a city rich in antiquity and early Christian treasures, and just endlessly fascinating. There's nowhere else like it.
We are fascinated with our own history, and we are fascinated with the Romans because they were millennia ago, and yet they still capture our imagination because they were actually so similar to us. They were very civilized. They had a very similar political system.
Greek tragedy was pre-Freudian, so every emotion has to be so raw; there are no psychological undertones.
No opposing quotes found.