The biggest difference in writing a sequel is that now there are expectations. But also - and this is the awesome part - now there are fans, too!
Sentiment: POSITIVE
The only reason I would write a sequel is if I were struck by an idea that I felt to be equal to the original. Too many sequels diminish the original.
When you're writing for a sequel and there's a movie that's been deemed sacred ground by the fanbase that's the predecessor, you cannot do anything to tread on that, so it's a bit trickier than just being able to sit down and write something.
There are expectations with sequels, and people want them to be bigger and better than the prequel.
The first is that instead of writing a sequel, which is what most people do, this is in fact a prequel. Although we didn't know that when we began the process.
There's a real danger in doing a sequel. There are some benefits, but that all hinges on how well you execute. Quite frankly, most sequels don't execute well.
I think sequels are fine if there's a story, so I think when there is a property that is worthy of a sequel, it could very well happen!
By definition a sequel can't be original. So you've got to figure out what worked the first time around.
When I am making a sequel, it needs to be different from what you have already seen. Yet, it needs to maintain a certain discipline so that people still associate it with the prequel.
The only reason ever to make a sequel is to spend more time with the characters that people love: to tell more of their story.
I think a sequel is a waste of money and time. I think movies should illuminate new stories.