It is not a sign of arrogance for the king to rule. That is what he is there for.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
In my opinion it is less shameful for a king to be overcome by force of arms than by bribery.
Fashion as King is sometimes a very stupid ruler.
There can be no failure to a man who has not lost his courage, his character, his self respect, or his self-confidence. He is still a King.
He who reigns within himself and rules passions, desires, and fears is more than a king.
If God had sufficient wisdom and power to construct such a beautiful world as this, then we must admit that his wisdom and power are immeasurably greater than that of man, and hence he is qualified to reign as king.
To be a king and wear a crown is a thing more glorious to them that see it than it is pleasant to them that bear it.
Why is it that the king can do no wrong? This shows they do not regard the king as being a human. But the king can do wrong.
He who is to be a good ruler must have first been ruled.
There is a very thin line between confidence and arrogance.
One's only rival is one's own potentialities. One's only failure is failing to live up to one's own possibilities. In this sense, every man can be a king, and must therefore be treated like a king.
No opposing quotes found.