When I started writing about art, there were no curators.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Contemporary curators orbit in the place of distribution and consumption, and less and less in the space of artists. I think it has become a lazy profession in regard to its relationship to the artists and the vigorous state of art making.
Painters were also attorneys, happy storytellers of anecdote, psychologists, botanists, zoologists, archaeologists, engineers, but there were no creative painters.
The privilege I've had as a curator is not just the discovery of new works... but what I've discovered about myself and what I can offer in the space of an exhibition - to talk about beauty, to talk about power, to talk about ourselves, and to talk and speak to each other.
Artists who take on curatorial activities have the advantage of negating the professional hurdles and limitations comprising institutions.
I was exposed to the arts, but there was no one in my family who was an artist.
My job is art curator, not artist. All I have ever wanted to do is immerse myself in art, to enjoy it, to learn about it, to write about it, to talk to others about it.
The arts don't exist in isolation.
I have some beautiful 20th-century drawings and a few paintings, but I'm not a collector, and I'm not particularly attached to objects.
I studied political science and international relations, so I never considered myself an artist.
The only people left in America who seem not to be artists are illustrators.
No opposing quotes found.