When you see violence in movies in general, it's very quick and painless, which isn't what it's like.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Physical violence is always a bore in films today. We don't see how much it hurts. We don't learn the true consequences of it.
From the director's point of view, it's infinitely easier to do violence than to do a good dramatic scene.
I don't feel comfortable with violence, and I'm not sure that I film violent scenes properly, and it's something I'm reticent to do, and yet violence is sort of in all of my films.
Once you do something violent in a film, you don't have to do too much. You do it once and the feeling of violence just stays there, do you know what I'm saying?
Violence is used to portray what happens in a film. It only helps portray the actors and what they do. I think it is more about the story, when you have something to play off of.
It's not that the film is violent, it's that people have an issue with violence right now.
Violence has been a part of films since the beginning of time. It's been a form of entertainment.
When I use violence in a movie, it's just to express the power, the impact of it.
I believe there are more films that involve love and forgiveness than violence, but they often seem fake and are almost embarrassing to watch.
Violence is a very ugly thing. Violence is often so casual on film, and made to look so cool and so sexy, but violence is a repulsive, repugnant act that human beings inflict on each other. It shouldn't seem to be cool and sexy, ever really.
No opposing quotes found.