I'm never interested in writing a kind of neutral, universal novel that could be set anywhere. To me, the novel is a local thing.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
That's why I write fiction, because I want to write these stories that people will read and find universal.
I use the setting of a small rural Norwegian community - the kind of place that I know so intimately. I could never write a novel set in a big city, because, frankly, I don't know what it would be like.
I think by writing about a place with great specificity, you manage to make it universal.
However, the difficulties and pleasures of the writing itself are similar for a novel with a historical setting and a novel with a contemporary setting, as far as I'm concerned.
I write contemporary fiction, and that is what my readers want to read.
I must be honest here; I don't think there's such a thing as 'unconventional' when it comes to YA. YA readers are the most open-minded in the literary world. They'll read anything.
I write the kinds of novels I like to read, where the setting is rendered with love and care.
My own writing has perhaps more of an American flavor than a British one, but that's because the stories I've so far written have needed it. 'Empire State,' 'Seven Wonders' and 'The Age Atomic' are all very place-centric, where the setting itself is almost a character. But there is a universality to story that isn't just limited to science fiction.
Wherever I am, I take books, not novels.
I always love novels that open up a subject to me - like raising a window to a beautiful, mysterious world outside.
No opposing quotes found.