It depends, because sometimes an action role can be very demanding, and sometimes a dialogue-driven character can be very demanding, and vice versa. It depends.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Quite often in acting, you have to play a certain part; you cannot speak as much as you want to speak.
Every role is physical to a certain extent, but as a viewer, I don't respond well to actors doing more than they need to tell a story.
I think I'm very strong at dialogue, I think I'm very strong in characterization. I think sometimes I use dialogue and character work to cover weaknesses in my plotting.
I love saying dialogue and creating a full character more than just being physical. But I always end up doing physical stuff in my roles.
We don't think of them as acting, but we take on certain characteristics based on where we function, and those relationships draw out aspects of who we are as people. And that's what acting is. Different parts draw out different parts of your nature.
I think that acting involves doing your job so well that you are able to help the viewer identify with the character.
Acting is all about truth and honesty, and the sensitivity that's capable of transporting you.
I think actors always find the dialogue doesn't quite fit, so you always have to play with it.
As an actor, one's role is very much to respond and react to the situation within the context of the character and his world.
I treat any scene the same - dialogue, action - you're still creating something in character. It's all acting, fighting.