I think he is an extremely accessible character. In Data there is no potential for cruelty.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
Cruelty is not a literary value.
I definitely could not write a character that was cruel or unconcerned with animal welfare. For me, not just as a writer but for the person I am, I love animals.
He who is cruel to animals becomes hard also in his dealings with men. We can judge the heart of a man by his treatment of animals.
Cruelty might be very human, and it might be cultural, but it's not acceptable.
Is the capacity for cruelty inherent in all of us?
He's not the finest character that ever lived. But he's a human being, and a terrible thing is happening to him. So attention must be paid.
Cruelty would be delicious if one could only find some sort of cruelty that didn't really hurt.
Whether you need to like a character, I don't think that's necessary in order to portray him.
There's a certain edge about cruelty. If you're honest about it, most people wince, but say it had to be said.
It's absolutely true that it's almost impossible to play a character without having any affection for him.
No opposing quotes found.