It is easy to study the rules of overloading and of templates without noticing that together they are one of the keys to elegant and efficient type-safe containers.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
With the increasing importance of standards for system-level objects such as COM and CORBA, it is particularly important that the C++ bindings to those be clean, well documented, and simple to use.
To speak about notation as the only way that you can guarantee structure of course is already very suspect.
I believe designers should eliminate the unnecessary. That means eliminating everything that is modish because this kind of thing is only short-lived.
Style equals pretense.
Always beware an unsigned architectural design.
Complexity that works is built up out of modules that work perfectly, layered one over the other.
There is no such thing as a natural fit between form and content. Seamless elegance would be tantamount to erasure.
I love cunning containers as much as anyone, but I've found that if I get rid of everything I don't need, I often don't need a container at all.
I don't like the idea of fitting into a mould so as to conform. What I like is the danger, the difference - being unpredictable.
The Priestly Code preponderates over the rest of the legislation in force, as well as in bulk; in all matters of primary importance it is the normal and final authority.