I didn't really know how to make a film when I made 'Control'. I had to create my own language, just as I did when I started taking photographs. I never studied either one.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
I wanted to just be a filmmaker, and I thought I wanted to do all the aspects, and it seemed like as a producer was the best way to do it, because I could have... You never have control on a movie, but you have as much control as you can.
'Control' had to do with my own life a lot, and that's why that seemed to be a film I could be the director of, because I had an emotional attachment to the whole story. And because of that experience, I feel that I can try other films. I didn't set out to become a director.
In film work, you do the best you can under the given circumstances, but you don't have control. At least, I don't.
With a film, you try to keep your vision in it. I think with 'The American' and 'Control' I managed to do that.
I went to film school to make films just because you're in control of the story.
As a filmmaker, the only way that I understand how to make a film is holistically.
Every time I do one I feel like I've never really quite learned anything. I always find that when I'm making a film, I find it a little bit like I'm doing it for the first time.
That's why I'm really trying to produce my own stuff. This film was so good, because I produced it myself, and developed it, and made it with New Line, which is a smaller studio, so I was in control of a lot of stuff that I wasn't in control of for my other films.
In that sense, film is superior, but the difficulty is your lack of control as a writer.
I like to control my films from beginning to end, to write them the way I want.