That's the difference between working on film and working in a play. In a play, you work on it, and you live in it and develop it and make it happen.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
The difference with doing a play is that you are in control. In film you are in the hands of the director and the editor and the producer.
Acting in the theatre is fun; acting in film is work.
Even if I don't have a job, I work on plays and scenes.
Working on a play is a vibrant and collaborative business. Everyone from the choreographer to the music director to the director to the writers work together toward the same goal, and everyone chimes in on everything.
I've always looked at filmmaking as a lifestyle. There is no decision of when you go to work. It's a way of life: you're thinking about scripts; you see things and think, 'That could be interesting'... I don't think about my work as, 'Today I'll work on this, this and that.' It just comes to me.
In a play, you only get one chance, and you have to get it perfect. In a film, you can change and fix it whatever way you want, so really, there's a pretty big difference.
There's no point in making films unless you intend to show us something special, otherwise just go out and watch a play.
The process of doing plays will make you an actor.
You can't work in the movies. Movies are all about lighting. Very few filmmakers will concentrate on the story. You get very little rehearsal time, so anything you do onscreen is a kind of speed painting.
Making a film or doing a play are completely different experiences and entirely fulfilling, but completely unique. I also think one complements the other. People often say that theater is about flexing your muscles, and is actually real acting, whereas I sort of disagree.
No opposing quotes found.