What's the point in being an unpopular writer? It just doesn't make a lot of sense. For me it doesn't, anyway.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Having been unpopular in high school is not just cause for book publications.
Writers have opinions - that, in part, is why they write. Therefore they have strong likes and dislikes.
People don't understand how much influence they can actually have on a writer, how much a writer's feelings can be hurt, how much they can deflect his course when they raise their voices like they did over highly personal books like 'Panama' or 'Bullet Park.'
One reason the human race has such a low opinion of itself is that it gets so much of its wisdom from writers.
There is a price for popularity. Critics look for your weaknesses, your flaws, anything that makes the work seem like a fluke and not seem worthy of all the attention it's getting.
For a writer, you definitely do not want to be in the mainstream. You want to be on the edge because that's where the vantage point is. That's where you can see.
The courage in journalism is sticking up for the unpopular, not the popular.
I wonder sometimes if the motivation for writers ought to be contempt, not admiration.
Some of my books sort of have a provocative take. Sometimes you find interesting things about characters that show they weren't necessarily the way people usually see them. It can make for lively conversations, but that's great. Spark a little controversy, get people to think about it. That's what it's all about.
It's like a novelist writing far out things. If it makes a point and makes sense, then people like to read that. But if it's off in left field and goes over the edge, you lose it. The same with musical talent, I think.
No opposing quotes found.