As an actor, you want to do your best but not overshine the film. No actor is above the film.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Your choices are very important. The only thing you have as actors are your choices: the option to say no to something. You don't want to take on a really bad job and be terrible in something - especially in film, because if you're bad in it, you're bad in it forever.
As a director/writer/producer, all you ever want is to work with actors who make you look better, who make the work you do seem as good as it can be and even better than it is.
If you do well as an actor, a good director will pick up on it, and keep it in the film.
As an actor, you know there are things you get asked to do that you do quite well, with less effort.
My job, as an actor, is to give the director options. You can only hope that the takes that you thought were the best were chosen. But, then again, if I don't watch it, I'll never know.
I try to get the best performance an actor can give.
I've been directed by other actors, and being an actor doesn't make you a good director.
An actor is only a part of the film, not the whole, and very often, he is moulded by the director. That is why a good director can make so much difference to a film.
Bad directors are the ones who want to tell you every move, and think they're a better actor than you.
There is a misperception, if you will, in critical response or even in Hollywood, that I can only do exaggerated characters. Or what they would call over-the-top performances. Well, this is completely false.
No opposing quotes found.