For me, nudity and strong language have never been huge loadbearing elements of how I like to tell a story. Graphic images certainly are.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
I'm not as good a writer as I'd like to be; therefore, I like to use images to tell stories.
I love telling stories with images. But I think there's more to just saying a movie is great visually.
It's too bad for us 'literary' enthusiasts, but it's the truth nevertheless - pictures tell any story more effectively than words.
Telling stories with visuals is an ancient art. We've been drawing pictures on cave walls for centuries. It's like what they say about the perfect picture book. The art and the text stand alone, but together, they create something even better. Kids who need to can grab onto those graphic elements and find their way into the story.
I understand the visual media very well, as I used to write comic books for Walt Disney, and I've written a graphic novel. How you carry a story in pictures is different than how you do it in text.
As writers, we do our best to conjure a world so vivid that the reader can practically walk through it - but we're still only using words and relying on readers to do a lot of work of imagining. Providing pictures as well as words offers a whole new dimension to the experience of consuming a story.
As a visual storyteller, a lot is learning what to include so you're not being redundant between images and text.
I avoided nudity unless a film couldn't be told without those scenes. If you look at my films, few of them have that element, yet nudity and male fantasies have become emblematic of my work.
I'm mostly drawn to narratives that are difficult for me to visualize.
I like stories that have a social impact and social attributes to them. That's the whole reason we make films: to broaden our limited view of things and to see how life is evolving elsewhere.
No opposing quotes found.